However, er, it's not quite right. How can we reduce costs and reduce expenditures to block traffic flow entrances? Isn't this income-generating expenditure becoming wartime communism? To reduce the number of broadcast platforms that Internet TV can access, and only open it to seven broadcasting and television broadcasting platforms such as the Central Internet TV, Hua Digital Media, and Hunan Broadcasting and Television. Even the USB-linked network functions are all forbidden for broadcasting and television. Millet, LeTV, iQIYI, IT buddies who are ambitious in the video ecosystem, have no children with that... It turns out that with internetization and flattening, resources can be monopolized, and monopolies can mean high prices. Profit and discourse.
Who is China TV's opponent?
Who is the guy who has given the Chinese TV a healthy development? Judging from the point of view of function, it is an Internet TV. From the perspective of content competition, it is a video website. From the point of view of the supply and demand market, it is the Chinese audience. We blame us too much for broadcasting and television.
You see, the classic of “Tian Ji’s horse racing†is universal in all resource battles. There is no short board to make a short board. Recall that we used intelligence ABC to collect information on Google. Now all the problems have become "Baidu." WeChat's expression includes LINE's amusement, but I'm sorry that you can only use INS to brush the picture. We need nationals who have been domesticated, and of course there are tuned users.
The same applies to the Internetization of television. It is not unfair and unfair. The most direct way to eliminate homogenization is to eliminate competitors. At present, the service fee for digital TV set-top boxes has a price advantage compared with developed countries, but it has become a disadvantage compared to domestic video websites. Therefore, once a huge amount of Internet video resources and more application experiences are connected to Internet TV through TV boxes and APPs, ordinary toll stations and set-top boxes will lose their significance. “Internet+†will devour the user base and marketing channels of the traditional TV network from both the platform and content levels, and the latter is obviously not willing to be a mere seller of content. Not to mention that nowadays in the content field, the native products of many video websites are also daunting.
So Lei Jun spent $1 billion to ask Chen Yin to do TV content. Iqiyi Sohu spent a lot of money on self-produced dramas, not only on the PC and on the mobile side against the TV station. What's more, it is to provide competitive copyright content under the restrictions of radio and television, with the help of TV boxes that are still relatively independent. However, in view of the hard work of the competent authorities, they do not know how long this road can take.
The hardware becomes a sad straw
There are policies, there are countermeasures, some people joke that if this ban comes true, I will buy a large high-definition display box for Internet TV. Is it really so good to force users? What difference does Radio and Broadcasting have made in splitting the Internet and TV from the practice of broadcasting monopoly rights in CCTV monopoly events?
However, it is even more tragic that when TV stations were faced with the run of video websites, their attempts at content innovation were repeatedly hit by “limited entertainment orders†and “limited ordersâ€. The big screen seems to have become the "welfare" that broadcasters have imposed on television stations. It is a comfort that does not benefit sustainable development.
Not relying on TV stations to change in the Internet situation, the radio and television that are unwilling to relax their power will only get farther and farther away from the user's tastes. They will even be slightly exacerbated by the television stations in terms of content production. Do you really want to make the monitor the only battlefield for television propaganda? I think of the electric screen in 1984. I believe it is not the truth behind it.
4.2mm Wire To Board Connectors are avialable in different terminations and sizes intended for use on a variety of applications. These connectors provide power and signal with different body styles, termination options, and centerlines. To find the wire to board set required, click on the appropriate sub section below.
4.2 mm pitch connectors Wire To Board Connectors
Fully isolated terminals, positive locking housings, low-engagement forces and polarized housings, also offers blind mating, TPA and higher current options. Pitch 4.20mm
4.2 mm pitch connectors wire to board connectors Including:
male housing
Male housing of connector, UL94V-0 and UL94V-2, hanging and panel mount, single row and dual row, 2 to 24 circuits.
Female housing
Female housing of connector, with locking latch in order to avoid loosing, and with polarity in order to avoid dis-mating. One row and dual rows, from 2 circuits to 24 circuits.
Terminal
The conductor of connector, brass or phosphor bronze, tin plated over nickel, selective gold plated as customer's requirement.
Header
Header, right angle and vertical , with peg and without peg, DIP soldering, single row and dual row, 2 to 24 circuits.
4.2 mm connectors wire to board connectors General Specification:
Current rating: 6A AC, DC.(AWG#18)
Voltage Rating: 600V AC,DC
Withstanding Voltage: 1500V AC/minute.
Insulation resistance: 1000MΩ min
Contact resistance: Initial Value/ 10mΩ max
Temperature rise: -40'C ~ 105'C.
4.2Mm Wire To Board Connectors
Circuit Board Connectors,4.2Mm Wire To Board Connectors,4.2Mm Pcb Wire To Board Connector,4.2Mm Pin Wire To Board Connector,.165" Wire To Board Connectors,4.2mm Power Connector
ShenZhen Antenk Electronics Co,Ltd , https://www.antenk.com